22 min read

DevSecOps: The Complete Guide to Integrating Security into Continuous Delivery

A comprehensive guide to implementing DevSecOps practices, covering the OWASP DevSecOps Guideline, security testing methodologies (SAST, DAST, SCA, IAST), Infrastructure as Code security, and practical strategies for embedding security into every stage of your CI/CD pipeline.

DevSecOps pipeline showing security integrated at every stage of software delivery

Security at the speed of DevOps

Key Takeaways

  • The OWASP DevSecOps Guideline provides a framework for implementing security across the entire CI/CD pipeline with eight core practices.
  • Different security testing types (SAST, DAST, SCA, IAST) serve complementary purposes and should be used together for comprehensive coverage.
  • Shift-left security means detecting and fixing vulnerabilities as early as possible, when remediation costs are lowest.
  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) security scanning is essential for preventing cloud misconfigurations before deployment.

Introduction: The DevSecOps Revolution

Traditional software development treated security as a gate at the end of the development process—a final hurdle before release. This approach created friction between development and security teams, delayed releases, and often resulted in security issues being discovered too late to address properly. DevSecOps fundamentally changes this dynamic by embedding security practices throughout the entire software development lifecycle.

DevSecOps Pipeline diagram showing security integration at every stage from Code through Build, Test, Release, Deploy to Operate with a security feedback loop
DevSecOps Pipeline: Security tools and practices integrated at every stage of the CI/CD pipeline

DevSecOps is the practice of integrating security practices and tools directly into the DevOps process, ensuring that security is a shared responsibility from the very first line of code. It's not about slowing down development; it's about building security in from the start so that teams can move faster with confidence.

“The ideal goal is to detect security issues (by design or application vulnerability) as fast as possible.”

— OWASP DevSecOps Guideline

The cost of fixing security vulnerabilities increases dramatically the later they are discovered. A vulnerability found in production can cost 100 times more to remediate than one caught during development. DevSecOps addresses this by shifting security left, automating security testing, and fostering a culture where everyone is responsible for security.

OWASP DevSecOps Guideline

The OWASP DevSecOps Guideline provides a comprehensive framework for implementing security in DevOps pipelines. It helps organisations of all sizes draw a perspective of a secure DevOps pipeline and then improve it based on customised requirements.

Core Implementation Steps

The OWASP guideline recommends implementing the following steps in a DevSecOps pipeline:

1. Secrets Scanning

Scan git repositories for potential credentials leakage before code is committed.

2. SAST

Static Application Security Testing to analyse source code for vulnerabilities.

3. SCA

Software Composition Analysis to identify vulnerable dependencies.

4. IAST

Interactive testing during QA to find runtime vulnerabilities.

5. DAST

Dynamic testing of running applications to simulate attacks.

6. IaC Scanning

Scan Terraform, Helm charts for misconfigurations.

7. Infrastructure Scanning

Continuous scanning of deployed infrastructure for vulnerabilities.

8. Compliance Check

Verify compliance with security standards and regulations.

Shift-Left Security Philosophy

“Shift left” refers to the practice of moving security testing earlier in the software development lifecycle. Rather than treating security as a final checkpoint, shift-left integrates security considerations from the earliest stages of development.

The Cost of Late Detection

Design
1x
Development
6x
Testing
15x
Production
100x

Relative cost of fixing security vulnerabilities at different stages

Shift-Left Practices

  • Security requirements in user stories: Include security acceptance criteria alongside functional requirements.
  • Threat modelling during design: Identify potential threats before writing code.
  • IDE security plugins: Catch vulnerabilities as developers write code.
  • Pre-commit hooks: Prevent secrets and vulnerable code from being committed.
  • Security-focused code reviews: Train developers to spot security issues during peer review.

Security Testing Methodologies

A comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline incorporates multiple types of security testing, each serving a specific purpose and applied at different stages:

SAST (Static Application Security Testing)

Analyses source code, bytecode, or binary code for security vulnerabilities without executing the application. Best applied early in the development lifecycle.

Best applied:Pre-commit, Pull Request, CI Pipeline

Popular Tools

SonarQube

Comprehensive code quality and security analysis platform

Semgrep

Lightweight, fast static analysis with custom rule support

Checkmarx

Enterprise-grade SAST with extensive language support

CodeQL

GitHub's semantic code analysis engine

Snyk Code

AI-powered real-time SAST in IDE and CI/CD

DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)

Tests running applications from the outside to find vulnerabilities that are only visible during runtime. Simulates attacks against the application.

Best applied:Staging Environment, Pre-Production

Popular Tools

OWASP ZAP

Open-source web application security scanner

Burp Suite

Industry-standard web vulnerability scanner

Nuclei

Fast vulnerability scanner with templated probes

Nikto

Web server scanner for dangerous files and outdated software

OWASP Amass

Network mapping and attack surface discovery

SCA (Software Composition Analysis)

Identifies open-source components in codebases and detects known vulnerabilities, licence compliance issues, and outdated dependencies.

Best applied:Continuous, Every Build

Popular Tools

Snyk

Comprehensive dependency and container vulnerability scanning

Dependabot

GitHub-native automated dependency updates

OWASP Dependency-Check

Open-source SCA tool with CVE detection

Mend (WhiteSource)

Enterprise SCA with licence compliance

Trivy

All-in-one security scanner for containers and IaC

IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)

Combines SAST and DAST approaches by analysing applications from within during runtime, providing real-time vulnerability detection with low false positives.

Best applied:QA Testing, UAT, Staging

Popular Tools

Contrast Security

Agent-based runtime security monitoring

Hdiv Security

Unified application security for runtime

Seeker

Synopsys IAST for continuous security testing

Veracode

Enterprise IAST with pipeline integration

IaC Security Scanning

Analyses Infrastructure as Code templates (Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes manifests) for security misconfigurations before deployment.

Best applied:Pre-commit, Pull Request, CI Pipeline

Popular Tools

Checkov

Policy-as-code for cloud infrastructure scanning

tfsec

Security scanner for Terraform code

KICS

Open-source IaC scanner supporting multiple formats

Terrascan

Detect compliance and security violations in IaC

Snyk IaC

IaC security with fix recommendations

Container Security

Scans container images for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and compliance issues. Includes runtime protection and image signing.

Best applied:Image Build, Registry, Runtime

Popular Tools

Trivy

Comprehensive container and artefact scanner

Grype

Fast vulnerability scanner for container images

Aqua Security

Full lifecycle container security platform

Prisma Cloud

Cloud-native security across the lifecycle

Sysdig

Runtime security and forensics for containers

CI/CD Pipeline Integration

Effective DevSecOps requires security controls at every stage of the CI/CD pipeline. Here's how to structure security activities across the deployment lifecycle:

StageSecurity ActivitiesTools
Code
  • Pre-commit hooks
  • IDE security plugins
  • Secrets scanning
  • Peer code review
git-secretsTalismanGitleakspre-commit
Build
  • SAST analysis
  • SCA scanning
  • Licence compliance
  • SBOM generation
SonarQubeSnykSyftCycloneDX
Test
  • DAST scanning
  • IAST analysis
  • Security unit tests
  • Fuzz testing
OWASP ZAPContrastJest securityAFL
Release
  • Image scanning
  • Artefact signing
  • Compliance gates
  • Approval workflows
TrivyCosignOPAGitHub Actions
Deploy
  • IaC scanning
  • Configuration validation
  • Secrets injection
  • Deployment verification
CheckovconftestVaultArgo CD
Operate
  • Runtime protection
  • Threat detection
  • Vulnerability monitoring
  • Incident response
FalcoSysdigPrometheusPagerDuty

Example GitHub Actions Workflow

YAML
name: DevSecOps Pipeline

on:
  push:
    branches: [main, develop]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  security-scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      
      # Secrets scanning
      - name: Gitleaks Scan
        uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2
        
      # SAST - SonarQube
      - name: SonarQube Scan
        uses: sonarsource/sonarqube-scan-action@master
        
      # SCA - Dependency scanning
      - name: Snyk Dependency Scan
        uses: snyk/actions/node@master
        with:
          args: --severity-threshold=high
          
      # Container scanning
      - name: Trivy Container Scan
        uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master
        with:
          image-ref: 'myapp:latest'
          severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'
          
      # IaC scanning
      - name: Checkov IaC Scan
        uses: bridgecrewio/checkov-action@master
        with:
          directory: ./terraform

Addressing OWASP Top 10

The OWASP Top 10 represents the most critical security risks to web applications. DevSecOps practices should specifically address each of these vulnerabilities:

A01

Broken Access Control

Prevention: Implement proper authorisation checks, deny by default, enforce record-level access control

A02

Cryptographic Failures

Prevention: Use strong encryption, proper key management, encrypt data in transit and at rest

A03

Injection

Prevention: Use parameterised queries, input validation, and ORM frameworks

A04

Insecure Design

Prevention: Threat modelling, secure design patterns, security requirements in user stories

A05

Security Misconfiguration

Prevention: Automated hardening, minimal installations, regular security reviews

A06

Vulnerable Components

Prevention: SCA scanning, dependency updates, component inventory (SBOM)

A07

Authentication Failures

Prevention: MFA, secure session management, credential rotation

A08

Software and Data Integrity

Prevention: Digital signatures, secure CI/CD pipelines, integrity verification

A09

Security Logging Failures

Prevention: Comprehensive logging, monitoring, and alerting

A10

Server-Side Request Forgery

Prevention: Input validation, network segmentation, deny by default firewall rules

Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)

A Software Bill of Materials is a formal, machine-readable inventory of software components and dependencies. SBOMs have become essential for supply chain security, particularly following high-profile incidents like the Log4Shell vulnerability.

Why SBOMs Matter

  • • Rapidly identify affected systems when vulnerabilities are disclosed
  • • Meet regulatory compliance requirements (US Executive Order 14028)
  • • Understand your software supply chain dependencies
  • • Enable automated vulnerability monitoring

SBOM Formats

  • SPDX: Linux Foundation standard, ISO/IEC 5962:2021
  • CycloneDX: OWASP lightweight SBOM standard
  • SWID: ISO/IEC 19770-2 software identification tags

Generating SBOMs

BASH
# Using Syft to generate SBOM# Using Trivy# Using Trivy# Using Trivy# Using Trivy# Using Trivy# For container images# For container images# For container images images
syft myimage:latest -o spdx-json > sbom.json

Building a Security Champions Programme

Security champions are developers who take on additional responsibility for promoting security within their teams. They serve as a bridge between security teams and development teams, helping to scale security expertise across the organisation.

Security Champion Responsibilities

1Conduct security code reviews
2Lead threat modelling sessions
3Triage security scanning results
4Train team members on security
5Advocate for security improvements
6Participate in incident response

Measuring DevSecOps Success

Effective DevSecOps programmes require measurable outcomes. Track these key metrics to assess your security posture and drive continuous improvement:

Mean Time to Remediation

Average time from vulnerability discovery to deployed fix. Target: critical < 24 hours.

Vulnerability Escape Rate

Percentage of vulnerabilities found in production vs. earlier stages.

Security Debt Ratio

Number of unresolved security issues relative to code size and age.

Pipeline Security Gate Pass Rate

Percentage of builds passing security gates on first attempt.

Troubleshooting

Common issues and solutions when implementing DevSecOps practices.

Security Scans Blocking Pipelines

Symptom: Builds failing due to security scan findings, slowing delivery.

Common causes:

  • All vulnerabilities treated as blocking
  • No baseline established for existing issues
  • False positives not managed
  • Scan timeouts on large codebases

Solution:

YAML
# Configure severity thresholds in CI# Create baseline file for existing issues# Create baseline file for existing issues# Create baseline file for existing issues# Create baseline file for existing issues# Create baseline file for existing issues# Fail only on new vulnerabilities# Fail only on new vulnerabilities# Fail only on new vulnerabilitiesbilities
trivy image --baseline baseline.json my-app:${'$'}{{ github.sha }}

Secret Scanning False Positives

Symptom: Secret scanner flagging test credentials, example code, or non-sensitive data.

Common causes:

  • Generic patterns matching non-secrets
  • Test fixtures containing example credentials
  • Base64-encoded config mistaken for secrets

Solution:

YAML
# .gitleaksignore - exclude known false positives# Use inline comments to mark false positives# Use inline comments to mark false positives# Configure custom rules in .gitleaks.toml# Configure custom rules in .gitleaks.tomlles in .gitleaks.toml
[allowlist]
  description = "Test credentials"
  paths = [
    '''tests/.*''',
    '''__fixtures__/.*'''
  ]

SAST Tools Producing Too Many Findings

Symptom: Thousands of findings making triage impossible.

Common causes:

  • Scanning third-party/vendored code
  • Including generated code in scans
  • No risk-based prioritisation
  • Legacy code included in new scan implementation

Solution:

YAML
# semgrep.yml - exclude directories and focus on high-impact# Start with high-confidence rules only# Start with high-confidence rules only# Start with high-confidence rules only# Implement incremental scanning for PRs# Implement incremental scanning for PRsremental scanning for PRs
semgrep --baseline-ref main --config auto

Container Image Vulnerabilities in Base Images

Symptom: Vulnerabilities in base image layers you don't control.

Common causes:

  • Using outdated base images
  • Base image maintainer slow to patch
  • Using full OS images instead of minimal

Solution:

DOCKERFILE
# Use distroless or minimal base images# Or use chainguard images with minimal CVEs# Automate base image updates with Renovate# Automate base image updates with Renovate# renovate.json# renovate.json# renovate.jsonvate.json
{
  "extends": ["config:base"],
  "docker": {
    "pinDigests": true
  },
  "schedule": ["before 6am on Monday"]
}

Developers Bypassing Security Controls

Symptom: Security tools disabled, findings ignored, or workarounds implemented.

Common causes:

  • Security seen as blocker rather than enabler
  • No clear remediation guidance provided
  • Tools too noisy with low-value findings
  • No security champions in development teams

Solution:

YAML
# Provide actionable fix suggestions# Most modern tools include remediation guidance# Create guardrails, not gates# Use warn mode before enforce mode# After 30 days, enable enforcement# After 30 days, enable enforcement# After 30 days, enable enforcement# Gamify security with metrics dashboards# Gamify security with metrics dashboards# Gamify security with metrics dashboards# Track "days since last critical vulnerability" last critical vulnerability"

Conclusion

DevSecOps is not merely about adding security tools to your pipeline—it's about fundamentally changing how organisations think about and implement security. By shifting security left, automating testing, and fostering a culture of shared responsibility, teams can deliver secure software at the speed modern business demands.

The OWASP DevSecOps Guideline provides an excellent framework for implementation, covering everything from secrets scanning to compliance checks. Combined with the right tools for SAST, DAST, SCA, IAST, and IaC scanning, organisations can build robust security into their delivery pipelines.

Success requires more than technology—it requires cultural change, executive support, and continuous learning. Start small, measure progress, and iterate. The goal is not perfection from day one, but continuous improvement towards a more secure software delivery process.

Troubleshooting Common DevSecOps Issues

Issue: Too Many False Positives

Security scanners generate excessive false positives, causing alert fatigue and ignored findings.

Solution:
YAML
# Create a .semgrepignore file for false positives# Ignore test files for certain rules# Suppress specific rules in code# nosemgrep: javascript.lang.security.audit.prototype-pollution# Configure Snyk to ignore specific vulnerabilities# .snyk file# .snyk file# Trivy - ignore specific CVEs# Trivy - ignore specific CVEs# Trivy - ignore specific CVEs# Trivy - ignore specific CVEs# Trivy - ignore specific CVEs# Trivy - ignore specific CVEs# .trivyignore# .trivyignoregnore
CVE-2023-12345  # Mitigated by network policy
CVE-2023-67890  # Not exploitable in our context

Issue: Pipeline Too Slow

Security scanning adds significant time to CI/CD pipelines, slowing down deployments.

Solution:
YAML
# Run security scans in parallel# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Use incremental scanning for PRs# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan results# Cache scan resultsresults
- name: Cache Snyk
  uses: actions/cache@v4
  with:
    path: ~/.snyk
    key: snyk-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}

Issue: Secrets Leaked to Git History

Secrets were accidentally committed and remain in git history even after deletion.

Solution:
BASH
# 1. IMMEDIATELY rotate the exposed secret!# 2. Use git-filter-repo to remove from history# expressions.txt format:# expressions.txt format:# expressions.txt format:# expressions.txt format:# expressions.txt format:# expressions.txt format:# regex:sk-[a-zA-Z0-9]{48}==>REMOVED_API_KEY# literal:my-password==>REMOVED_PASSWORD# 3. Force push (coordinate with team!)# 4. Set up pre-commit hooks to prevent future leaks# .pre-commit-config.yaml# .pre-commit-config.yamlommit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks
    rev: v8.18.0
    hooks:
      - id: gitleaks
  - repo: https://github.com/Yelp/detect-secrets
    rev: v1.4.0
    hooks:
      - id: detect-secrets
        args: ['--baseline', '.secrets.baseline']

DevSecOps Maturity Checklist

Assess your DevSecOps maturity level with this checklist:

Level 1: Foundation

Level 2: Integrated

Level 3: Advanced

Level 4: Optimised

Frequently Asked Questions

DevSecOps is the practice of integrating security practices and tools directly into the DevOps process, ensuring that security is a shared responsibility from the very first line of code. It embeds security throughout the entire software development lifecycle rather than treating it as a final gate before release.
While DevOps focuses on collaboration between development and operations teams to deliver software faster, DevSecOps adds security as a core component of this collaboration. In DevSecOps, security is not a separate phase but is integrated into every stage of the CI/CD pipeline, from code commit to production deployment.
Shift-left security refers to the practice of moving security testing earlier in the software development lifecycle. Rather than treating security as a final checkpoint, shift-left integrates security considerations from the earliest stages of development. This approach significantly reduces the cost of fixing vulnerabilities, as issues found in production can cost up to 100 times more to remediate than those caught during development.
DevSecOps pipelines typically include SAST tools (SonarQube, Semgrep, CodeQL), DAST tools (OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite), SCA tools (Snyk, Dependabot, Trivy), IAST tools (Contrast Security), IaC scanners (Checkov, tfsec), container security tools (Trivy, Grype), and secrets scanners (Gitleaks, git-secrets). The specific tools depend on your technology stack and security requirements.
Start by implementing secrets scanning and dependency scanning (SCA) in your CI/CD pipeline, as these provide quick wins with minimal disruption. Then gradually add SAST, container scanning, and IaC security scanning. Establish a security champions programme to embed security knowledge in development teams, and focus on building a culture where security is everyone's responsibility.
DevSecOps reduces security vulnerabilities in production, lowers the cost of remediation by catching issues early, speeds up delivery by eliminating security bottlenecks, improves compliance with security standards and regulations, and fosters a culture of shared security responsibility across development, operations, and security teams.

References & Further Reading

Related Articles

Ayodele Ajayi

Senior DevOps Engineer based in Kent, UK. Specialising in cloud infrastructure, DevSecOps, and platform engineering. Passionate about building secure, scalable systems and sharing knowledge through technical writing.